Werewolf at Doom Castle Excess [Sat. 14 May - Tue. 17 May]

[Qanda]

Either way, simply sharing it with CW makes no sence at all.

Qanda appears and modkills sirclucky for using his most hated non-word, "sence".

Just joking clucky.

Day 3 votes:

sirclucky - 3: CWisgood, o_0, Wind
CWisgood - 1: sirclucky

21 alive, 11 votes for majority, 16 for locking

Random question Wind: Why are you using Matt's sig?

[Wind]

That's true, I didn't think of that. I guess CWisgood can clear us on this point... hopefully.

[Qanda]

Random question Wind: Why are you using Matt's sig?

That's true, I didn't think of that. I guess CWisgood can clear us on this point... hopefully.

[Wind]

100% OT-ness:
Matt's sig? What are you talking about?
Anyway I was playing NQ, posting and checking my contest at the same time... I posted a bit late, and meanwhile you thought it was your duty to update the vote count again...
Qanda is counting the posts too often! He's evil, let's vote him! Oh, wait...

[Qanda]

100% OT-ness:
Matt's sig? What are you talking about?
Anyway I was playing NQ, posting and checking my contest at the same time... I posted a bit late, and meanwhile you thought it was your duty to update the vote count again...
Qanda is counting the posts too often! He's evil, let's vote him! Oh, wait...

For some weird reason you sig was showing up as Matt's, but after refreshing the page I found that you are actually using your own sig. Weird.

And I try to update vote counts on every new page so that it is easier for me to keep track of them.

[Matt]

CWisgood has two options:

(1) He dies. He doesn't do anything to stop it, and is executed.
(2) He tries to incriminate one person he believes to be good, and says that someone 'daydreamed' of them. I have never known such a thing, though possible, and the likelihood of that plus a good/evil dream, 2 times in 2 days? I really consider that unlikely. He'll die anyway, but he takes down one innocent and lasts an extra day.

Vote: CWisgood

[o_0]

Besides, who'd waste a "daydream" on day 2 (if there even is a such thing)?

[DiscordantNote]

Gah! I thought the smiles meant something. Though I didn't participate in past WW games, I read along.

I won't vote just yet.

[LAQ]

After reading the past few pages, I don't know who to vote for. CW is accusing clucky, and clucky is accusing CW. CW's defence seems a little weird, but I really don't know. o.o

[Monique]

Honestly I don't know what to think about CW, so I'm just going to wait and see if anything happens.

Vote: Alex
Vote: o_0

EDIT:
sorry I didn't give an explanation. They both sent in lists last night, leading me to believe that they could be baddies.

[Chipper]

I thought that we only get 1 vote this game. Due to all that has happened I am undecided at this time as to who to vote for. I'm waiting for more evidence.

[jellyoflight]

Matt's got a very good point, but I think I'm gonna save my vote for a while.

[Monique]

o_O I thought that we only get 1 vote this game. Due to all that has happened I am undecided at this time as to who to vote for. I'm waiting for more evidence.

EDIT:
Sorry I think you're right. I'm just getting confused between the two games.

Unvote: o_0 ... I just picked one randomly.

and If you want evidence all I can tell you is that I had a sp to intercept to people's lists, I randomly chose o_0 and Alex and got their lists for the night sent back to me. Since I got them, they obviously would become void. If you didn't notice, only one killing happened last ngiht, meaning something stopped the other baddies from killing and I can only assume it's becasue I have their lists. It really is the only logical solution.

[Alex]

Er... right. o.O What makes you think that just because a list was sent in from me, I'm automatically bad?

[Monique]

It's a 50/50 chance to be entirely honest. Based on what I do know though, the liklihood is that you are evil. Honestly, does anyone have any other leads?! This is as good as the evidence gets.