Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:48 pm
Matt wrote:To be honest, the Vigilante isn't the best ever role. I'd wait till a dreamer or healer dies first.
Pixa, I'll trust you but, if you are wrong, then I'm going to go after you - that's how things normally work.
Vote: Jamie
Yeah, I understand that. I won't disappoint, though.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:11 pm
Vote: Jamie ... I'm going to trust you Pixa. I just hope that you know what you're talking about.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:39 pm
Matt wrote:To be honest, the Vigilante isn't the best ever role. I'd wait till a dreamer or healer dies first.
CD was a dreamer. He died. If we revive anyone, it should be him.
Secondly, I am NOT voting Jamie. I have him on my MSN and I know full well his role. Jamie is innocent. I cannot tell you his role, he'd have to do that if he wants to save his own skin, but if Pixa is about to speculate on an innocent, well, my vote will go to him.
Vote: Pixa
Pixa, or anyone else, if you send me any evidence at all that I think is valid, and I think is good enough, I will change my tune. But Jamie has told me his role, and I believe him 100%. Maybe I will think otherwise if otherwise convinced.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:42 pm
Well it's Pixa's word against Jamies.
May the best man win
May the best man win
Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:19 pm
I'll wait to see what comes of this evidence, but I personally am leading toward voting for Jamie. Pixa has less reason to just suddenly lie about someones role.
Hmmm.
Hmmm.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:25 pm
matterbug wrote:Pixa has less reason to just suddenly lie about someones role.
Could I ask why Pixa has "less reason", and Jamie has more? You don't know Jamie's role, so how do you know that Pixa has less reason to lie about someone's role?
Would like that explained.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:34 pm
Anubis wrote:matterbug wrote:Pixa has less reason to just suddenly lie about someones role.
Could I ask why Pixa has "less reason", and Jamie has more? You don't know Jamie's role, so how do you know that Pixa has less reason to lie about someone's role?
Would like that explained.
Annie if Pixa really is the gossiper, and innocent, then he would have voted Jamie due to Jamie doing something evil.
If Pixa isn't the gossiper then we will realise that he was lying after the end of tonight and his evilness would show and we could kill him anyway.
So if Pixa was evil he wouldn't just blurt out that Jamie was evil because all he would have achieved is Jamie dying and his role being found out.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:35 pm
Anubis wrote:matterbug wrote:Pixa has less reason to just suddenly lie about someones role.
Could I ask why Pixa has "less reason", and Jamie has more? You don't know Jamie's role, so how do you know that Pixa has less reason to lie about someone's role?
Would like that explained.
What I mean is that Pixa just brought it up suddenly. He just made himself a target, when he might not have been before. Pixa has no reason to lie, unless he is a baddy really intent on killing an innocent- but then he'll be voted out if he's wrong.
Does that make more sense?
Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:42 pm
I hear you two, and I understand what you're saying, but Jamie has told me his role and I believe him. I don't know what mindframe Pixa is in at the moment, but right now, I'm leaning towards Jamie being good, not Pixa.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:47 pm
Rules wrote:7. Lying is part of the game. Don't be hurt/offended to see one of your best friends has lied to you in order to advance the game. It's just a game guys. It's just a game. Game. Game. Life. No wait! I mean game.
Pixa has told me that he is in fact a good guy and I believe him as well but at the end of the day one of them is lying and there is more evidence, at the moment, that Pixa is telling the truth
Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:53 pm
I have found no evidence whatsoever that Jamie is bad. I believe him. For the moment, that's all I can say.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:14 pm
Hmm... I think you've been misled. There's no reason for him to come out and say this, if it wasn't really true. Not only that, but the chance is low that someone is going to come out and accuse someone of doing something if they didn't do it. It's not likely. So, either he lied to you, or you're on the same team as him. 
Vote - Jamie
Vote - Jamie
Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:26 pm
Vote: Jamie
Pixal told me his role from day 1. He even proved it by telling me about something I did one night.
I trust him.
Pixal told me his role from day 1. He even proved it by telling me about something I did one night.
I trust him.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:33 pm
Vote: Jamie
For a baddie, it would be dumb to accuse someone out of the blue.
For a baddie, it would be dumb to accuse someone out of the blue.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:38 pm
You know Anubis, for me to have concrete evidence, and to come out like that, when Jamie is revealed the baddie tonight from execution, you are going to become a prime target. I know, if you claim to have evidence that is undeniable of a baddie, if they aren't, of course, I'm going to be the next target. I'm not a fool. I know what I'm doing, by not followin, you are looking like a baddie. Just a thought.
Oh, and on the reviving, I think a vigilante is more useful for just one night. Over time, I'd prefer a dreamer, but it will only be for one cycle.
Oh, and on the reviving, I think a vigilante is more useful for just one night. Over time, I'd prefer a dreamer, but it will only be for one cycle.
Last edited by Pixa on Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.