Pink Poogle Toy Forum

The official community of Pink Poogle Toy. Bear with me while I tweak everything
It is currently Thu Sep 17, 2026 8:36 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 237 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 516 Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:31 pm 
PPT Baby
PPT Baby
Offline

Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:33 pm
LAQ wrote:
I hate to bother people, but I've been looking for my second constalation for the past hour in the star mapper, but I can't find it anywhere. ._. Could somebody point me in the general area please?

http://xs74.xs.to/pics/06135/starmap.gif

:oops:


It's messy, buh I think this is right. http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f146/ ... tarmap.gif[/img]

Waha, looks like someone else beat me to helping you xD

_________________
I'd say something witty if I could. But we can't always be so smooth.


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:32 pm 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
Offline

Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 11:03 am
Website: http://tangerine-dragon.deviantart.com
Location: Indiana
JhasNeeh wrote:
Troggy7 wrote:
Well, most of of have found our dancer, its just not in the plot yet

I hope they release it today... I dont feel like waiting the whole weekend


As Snak asked, can we remember that this is SPECULATION and not speculation that everyone agrees with.


While it is speculation, there's been no solid evidence against the Dancer being said hexagonal shape other than the image on the TCG card. But even then, the TCG card isn't always exactly precise to what we'll see in the sky. ;)

Just trying to play Devil's Advocate. Don't be hatin'. :)

_________________
Awesome av by Silja!


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:33 pm 
PPT Baby
PPT Baby
Offline

Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 6:14 am
Website: http://pancakesandlove.deviantart.com/
Yahoo Messenger: xsiyana_taladorx
To make this quick though I'm sure it's no, is the third one out yet?

_________________
In the land of the Blind the one eyed man is king.


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:35 pm 
PPT Student
PPT Student
Offline

Posts: 406
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:20 am
Yahoo Messenger: LukeAces
Moon wrote:
JhasNeeh wrote:
Troggy7 wrote:
Well, most of of have found our dancer, its just not in the plot yet

I hope they release it today... I dont feel like waiting the whole weekend


As Snak asked, can we remember that this is SPECULATION and not speculation that everyone agrees with.


While it is speculation, there's been no solid evidence against the Dancer being said hexagonal shape other than the image on the TCG card. But even then, the TCG card isn't always exactly precise to what we'll see in the sky. ;)

Just trying to play Devil's Advocate. Don't be hatin'. :)


The TCG and the glyph against a far too obvious set of stars that only vaguely resembles a stretched version of the already streched gem pattern.

Edit: Mint, if it's in the first post it's out, if it's not - it's not. :P

_________________
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:38 pm 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
Offline

Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:01 pm
Well, for what it's worth, I think I can make out the Dancer formation everyone is getting all excited about in the ceiling jewels.

Image

I can't come up with a formation in those ceiling jewels that would make a perfect hexagon though, but maybe someone else had better luck.


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:40 pm 
PPT Student
PPT Student
Offline

Posts: 406
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:20 am
Yahoo Messenger: LukeAces
farside wrote:
Well, for what it's worth, I think I can make out the Dancer formation everyone is getting all excited about in the ceiling jewels.

Image

I can't come up with a formation in those ceiling jewels that would make a perfect hexagon though, but maybe someone else had better luck.


As has been said, the gems are streched on the X axis, so there would be that gap, but the star gap is even bigger than that.

_________________
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:42 pm 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
Offline

Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 11:03 am
Website: http://tangerine-dragon.deviantart.com
Location: Indiana
JhasNeeh wrote:
farside wrote:
Well, for what it's worth, I think I can make out the Dancer formation everyone is getting all excited about in the ceiling jewels.

Image

I can't come up with a formation in those ceiling jewels that would make a perfect hexagon though, but maybe someone else had better luck.


As has been said, the gems are streched on the X axis, so there would be that gap, but the star gap is even bigger than that.


Oh, I see what you mean now. Yeah, it does look stretched...

Maybe Sasha the Dancer had an oblong tamborine? :P

_________________
Awesome av by Silja!


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:46 pm 
PPT God
PPT God
Offline

Posts: 1097
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Mystery Island
Also keep in mind that some, like myself, simply don't have the Dancer on our starmap yet. For all we know, the "Dancer" everyone is finding could simply be a red herring. o_O

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:49 pm 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
Offline

Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:01 pm
JhasNeeh wrote:
farside wrote:
Well, for what it's worth, I think I can make out the Dancer formation everyone is getting all excited about in the ceiling jewels.

Image

I can't come up with a formation in those ceiling jewels that would make a perfect hexagon though, but maybe someone else had better luck.


As has been said, the gems are streched on the X axis, so there would be that gap, but the star gap is even bigger than that.


What do you mean by "stretched on the X axis"? I saw no indication of any stretching of the gems versus the actual constellations on the Dreamer or Sleeper. I did not measure them precisely, but the Dreamer and Sleeper gems look proportionately exact to their telescope counterparts with no skewing. Likewise, the stars people are indicating as the Dancer seem to match this pattern in the jewels. Again, I'd be happy to join the con's if a better pattern could be made from these jewels.


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:51 pm 
PPT Baby
PPT Baby
Offline

Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:47 am
April Fools+TnT+Plot=?
I smell something red and fishy.


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:55 pm 
PPT God
PPT God
Offline

Posts: 1838
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 11:00 pm
Website: http://www.livejournal.com/users/okamotosan2003/
Yahoo Messenger: okamotosan2003
Location: Since it's not a rule to put real info in here to help people, I live in Lala land
The constellation formation is stretched, as in the stars don't make a perfect tamborine shape because stars don't tend to bend to the will of people trying to make constellations, lol

_________________
Image
Image


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:57 pm 
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
Offline

Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:01 pm
okamotosan18 wrote:
The constellation formation is stretched, as in the stars don't make a perfect tamborine shape because stars don't tend to bend to the will of people trying to make constellations, lol


But I am saying there is no perfect tamborine shape to be made in those jewels.


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:05 pm 
PPT Student
PPT Student
Offline

Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 6:03 am
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Seriously people, it's absolutely pointless getting defensive over one side or the other in the Dancer argument.

So far, everything that has been "found" since the Dreamer is pure speculation, and therefore, despite what "proof" people may have, can't be proven one way or another so can we please do away with all of this "I am right, you are wrong" stuff?

In this case, we'll just have to wait for TNT to release the clues and we'll see.


As for the April Fool's Day stuff, something tells me that TNT wouldn't be so cruel as to incorporate their joke into the plot. Generally, the joke extends no further than the news (at least, not that I remember in the last few years).

TNT tend to take their plots seriously, even for mini-plots, so I doubt they'd go out of their way to make this plot into a joke.

_________________
Image


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:07 pm 
PPT Baby
PPT Baby
Offline

Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:47 am
Remember when they deleted the entire site for a day and replaced it with some stupid Kid-Pets thingy? Or remember when they completely emptied some people's banks and sdbs? That definately went further than the news. And apparently they don't take plots seriously because they:
Drag Them Out
Give crappy prizes
Make the comics repetitive
Abandon some (a.k.a. kreludor...I was so smurf after I bought neocola tokens and got a battle set ready and then they said they were cancelling it)
Edit:Nice filters....smurf


Top
 
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:10 pm 
PPT Student
PPT Student
Offline

Posts: 406
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:20 am
Yahoo Messenger: LukeAces
farside wrote:
JhasNeeh wrote:
farside wrote:
Well, for what it's worth, I think I can make out the Dancer formation everyone is getting all excited about in the ceiling jewels.

Image

I can't come up with a formation in those ceiling jewels that would make a perfect hexagon though, but maybe someone else had better luck.


As has been said, the gems are streched on the X axis, so there would be that gap, but the star gap is even bigger than that.


What do you mean by "stretched on the X axis"? I saw no indication of any stretching of the gems versus the actual constellations on the Dreamer or Sleeper. I did not measure them precisely, but the Dreamer and Sleeper gems look proportionately exact to their telescope counterparts with no skewing. Likewise, the stars people are indicating as the Dancer seem to match this pattern in the jewels. Again, I'd be happy to join the con's if a better pattern could be made from these jewels.


My proof:
Image

And now I leave, with a massive headache. Farewell.

_________________
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 237 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 516 Next

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited