Pink Poogle Toy Forum

I'd die too.

Jacob Black's a much more correct answer.


JK!

_________________

Set by the amazing Kitten Medli.
Wanna see some of my writing? Click here!

Considering Jacob ends up falling in love with a BABY I would say that neither Edward or Jacob are suitable answers

_________________

set by Sakura

I know. Hence the JK.

_________________

Set by the amazing Kitten Medli.
Wanna see some of my writing? Click here!

Still, when you look beyond the baby loving, neither Jacob or Edward are suitable for anyone. SRSLY.
Edward = weird creepy stalker guy who will climb into your room for twoo months just to watch you sleep
Jacob = strange self pitying guy who decides to vent his frustration upon that of his 'pack'.

Stephanie Meyer really didn't develop her characters too well.....and don't get me started on Charlie or Emmet.

_________________

set by Sakura

Is it bad that I didn't pick up on that? I focused more on his perverted tendency to take advantage of Bella. Sick and wrong.

_________________

[Manufactured by Byakuya San]

I think that Charlie was really well developed, personally.

_________________

Set by the amazing Kitten Medli.
Wanna see some of my writing? Click here!

XD!!!
I actually had my name on Subeta "Edward Cullen," (now it's "That One") and I had a million Twihards commenting me "OMG I LOVE TWILIGHT."

I've tried to read the books, and tbh, I can't get into it. The writing is so dry and redundant, and I don't think I've ever really seen such underdeveloped characters.

_________________

I completely agree, but I read the books after I a Chuck Palahniuk binge. Anything not involving deviant addictions and prolapsing intestines was looking good

[Edit]

I came across this lovely gem from a Twilight fan, a felt model of Bella's womb.
Discuss.

_________________

[Manufactured by Byakuya San]

Wait, what. WAIT, WHAT. That's just... Well... o_o

_________________
I don't exist. omo

Vote: Disturbed. LOL, seriously.

_________________
niel/dark_draconis88 on Neo/GPX+

Devourer of Oranges

it is bad movie,just for one view and even that one i was trying no to fall asleep

_________________
love red wine )

I think the fetus thing was not the best thing to look at right before you're thinking about going to bed...strange is about all I have to say.

Anyway, I was completely against reading Twilight, it didnt sound interesting at all. Then I was forced to see some of the movie at school, of course I wanted to see the whole thing just because I could. Finally I gave in and read the books. I hate to admit it but I secrectly liked them.

I do agree completely with this and I do not understand the facination with either of them

_________________

Awesome set by Tomatie

I'm gonna see New Moon just for the lulz and angstlicious angst angsty angst. Anyone else?

_________________
I don't exist. omo

I read Twilight because my friend was forcing me to. I didn't like it until the battle scene. I was raring to read the second book, but my book had the "sneak peek" first chapter of the next book. After reading that I decided I wouldn't continue, especially since my friend told me that the first book was the best and I begrudgingly go through it.

I started reading the Sookie Stackhouse series recently and realized that this series is everything I though Twilight was going to be, but ten times better. If you're craving a vampire book I suggest reading them. It's the books the HBO hit TrueBlood was based after. Keep in mind HBO has made the show's first season very similar to the first book and they rate it MA.

_________________

Like in waiting rooms and long lines that made you late or mall parking lots on holidays
Blog | Flickr | Twitter | Zune

You know, I can't see how people like one series and dislike the other. I think they are both pretty bad and full of the lulz. However, True Blood is a wicked good show.

I read the first Sookie Stackhouse bood. It was so. bad. I'm sorry.

_________________

[Manufactured by Byakuya San]